When More Isn’t Better: Making Smarter Financial Decisions Without Information Overload
If you spend any time on the internet, you can easily find millions of solutions or opinions on what is the best solution to your problem, your next purchase, the hottest investment, the largest tax loophole, the best workout—the list goes on.
Search “tax loophole” — and you’ll be left doom scrolling for the foreseeable future.
But this mass of information typically just leaves us researching options or feeling overwhelmed, and we do nothing, rather than creating a solid plan for what we actually need.
A study titled Decision Making Processes and Outcomes examined how adults of all ages make decisions when given access to multiple pieces of information. Participants were asked to make realistic choices (like selecting the best car for someone) while researchers tracked how they searched for and used information.
The results were clear.
The quality of decisions was not driven by how much information people reviewed, but by how well they focused on the most relevant information.
In other words, better decisions come from better filtering, not more data.
Why This Matters for Your Finances
We see this often in financial conversations, both personally and professionally.
Instead of first asking ourselves, what information would be relevant to allow us to live how we envisioned, we typically default to trying to intake as much as “financial” information (think blogs, social media, podcasts, YouTube videos, books, etc.).
But it’s important to remember—
Some of these approaches might not work well together
Some might come from people that have completely different situations or goals as you
Some might take significant time away from your family or regular life that you don’t want to commit to (extra job, real estate ventures, watching hours of YouTube videos versus enjoying your evening, etc.)
The shear quantity of information might leave us spinning with no idea what to do next.
What This Looks Like in Real Life
Imagine two people making a financial or investment decision.
Chuck reads dozens of articles, watches daily market updates, considers every possible scenario, and constantly adjusts their thinking.
Jane starts by asking:
What am I trying to accomplish?
How long do I have?
What level of risk fits my situation?
Then builds a strategy around those answers and filters out everything that doesn’t align.
Jane is far more likely to make a clear, confident, and effective decision.
The research is clear— better decisions don’t come from more information, they come from better use of information.
Instead of asking, “What else should I know?” a better question might be:
“What actually matters here?”
Because in many cases, the difference between a good decision and a poor one isn’t how much we know—it’s what we know.